The Effect of video-mediated communication on negotiations in fixed-pie situations. A comparison of pareto-efficiency with face-to- face communication

Seminar paper from the year 2018 in the subject Business economics - Miscellaneous, grade: 1,3, Technical University of Munich, language: English, abstract: In todays business world, you must be tough, smart and witty in order to succeed and to satisfy your superior. Oftentimes you go into a negotiation only knowing the target price you have to achieve and not looking for a valuable compromise. Chasing only after the biggest possible share of this fixed-pie and assuming the negotiator on the other side of the table does so too, hinders you from being a successful negotiator. Furthermore, in sales negotiations you often try to achieve the highest selling price possible and if the other party cannot agree on a price close to that point, you sell the object for the minimum price that was given to you, so you will still satisfy your superior. If you cannot not manage to sell for the minimum price, you decline the offer, stop the negotiations and chose your best alternative to negotiated agreement (BATNA). Unfortunately, many people go into negotiations not even knowing their own BATNA. In this case, a negotiator might sell the object for a lower price than the one that could have achieved without this negotiation. Good negotiators do not only know their own BATNA, they also have an approximate idea about the BATNA of the opposing party, so they can develop their strategy based on that knowledge and will more likely succeed in the negotiation. The outcomes of negotiations do not only depend on the alternatives of each party or the asymmetric distribution of information, but also on the communication method the parties use. Depending on the position of each party it is more efficient to use a traditional face-to-face communication method or to make use of digital support, like video-mediated communication methods (VMC, i.e. Skype, facetime, etc.). We would like to improve (integrative) negotiation outcomes by addressing the following question: does the use of VMC lead