Children BooksTheoretical Foundations of Programming Methodology : Lecture Notes of an International Summer School, directed by F. L. Bauer, E. W. Dijkstra and C. A
Item 1 of 1
Item 1 of 1
SKU 9789027714626Publishing Ref 9789027714626
Springer
Theoretical Foundations of Programming Methodology : Lecture Notes of an International Summer School
directed by F. L. BauerE. W. Dijkstra and C. A
Printed Book
SR 346
Inclusive of VAT
Sold as: EACH
SR21Per Month/24 months
SKU 9789027714626Publishing Ref 9789027714626
Author:Broy, M.
Date of Publication: 1982
Book classification:Children Books,English Books,Science & Mathematics,
No. of pages:676 Pages
Format:Paperback
This book is printed on demand and is non-refundable after purchase
Available Formats :
Printed Book
It will be sent to your address
SR346
Incl. VAT
Choose your delivery preference
Secure Shopping
Convenient Returns
Genuine & Warranted
Fast Delivery
Or
About this Product
Long ago the welfare of a sooiety used to depend heavily on the skill and dedioation of its oraftsmen - the miller the blaok- smith the oobbler and the tailor. These oraftsmen aoquired their skill by a long and poorly paid apprentioeship to some master of their oraft. They learned by imitation and experienoe and by tri- al and error. They did not read books or study soienoe they knew nothing of the theory of their subjeot the geometry of their ru- dimentary drawings nor the mathematios underlying their primitive oaloulations. They oould not explain how or why they used their methods; yet they worked effeotively by themselves or in small teams to oomplete their tasks at a predioted oost to a fairly well predioted timesoale and usually to the satisfaotion of their olients. The programmer of today shares many of these attributes of a oraftsman. He learns his oraft by apprentioeship in an existing team of programmers - but his apprentiaeship is highZy paid and usually very short. He develops his skill by trial; but mostly by error. He does not study theory or even read books on Computer Soience. He knows nothing of the logical and mathematical founda- tions of his profession; and he hates to explain or justifY or even to dooument what he has done.